Cab someone please explain for what purpose I can use cactchall.

-- 

Best Regs,
Masood Ahmad Shah
System Administrator

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|   Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan
|   Tel: +92-42-6677024
|   Mobile: +92-300-4277367
|   http://www.fibre.net.pk
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
"All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the universe and
a quick recompile."


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Raftery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailadmin] Postmaster catchall doesn't forward


> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 10:12:39AM -0700, Tom Collins wrote:
> > It's been a long standing problem and we're going to take care of it
> > all around.  We'll be patching qmailadmin to use email addresses for
> > the catchall, forwards and aliases instead of using direct Maildir
> > delivery (which bypasses any special rules set up for that address,
> > like forwarding postmaster).
>
> Please don't release code which makes exclusive use of email addresses
> for catchalls.
>
> If a message is reinjected the original envelope will be lost. Such a
> change to the code would make a qmailadmin generated catchall useless
> for serialmail, vodmr and anything else that uses the original envelope.
>
> In a catchall situation the original envelope is vital! If you reinject
> all messages to the catchall target you discard the only record of who
> the actual message recipient was. Please don't do this.
>
>
> ATB,
> james
>
>


Reply via email to