[qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** weird headers

[my.mailing.lists]

I have a problem with my spamassassin , when i put certain ipblocks on my tcp.smtp file   127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="15",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="3",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan" x.x.x.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"   output in my headers will be   Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 5259 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2006 03:47:52 -0000 Received: from smtp.example.com (HELO smtp.example.com) (x.x.x.x)   by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2006 03:47:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7267 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jul 2006 03:49:03 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 7261, pid: 7262, t: 0.0667s          scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.3/m:39/d:1600 Received: from unknown (HELO khuain9dcdad6f) (x.x.x.x)   by smtp.comclark.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2006 03:49:03 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "USER" [EMAIL PROTECTED]   it seems that spamassassin is not executed but when i remove the ipblocks in my tcp.smtp , my header wil be  different   Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 5259 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2006 03:47:52 -0000 Received: from smtp.example.com (HELO smtp.example.com) (x.x.x.x)   by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2006 03:47:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7267 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jul 2006 03:49:03 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 7261, pid: 7262, t: 0.0667s          scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.3/m:39/d:1600 spam: 3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on smtp.comclark.com X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX,  HTML_90_100,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from unknown (HELO khuain9dcdad6f) (x.x.x.x)   by smtp.comclark.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2006 03:49:03 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "USER" [EMAIL PROTECTED]   can someone enlighten me about this problem.   Warm Regards, Manny