Nah,
Static IP's are better for mail servers. Especially when you take
DomainKeys, spf, and other things into account that require knowing
the source.
Erik
On 2/10/07, Vince Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running several servers on dynamic IP's. The reverse DNS is not
important for those.
Your upstream provider should be able to provide you with a mail server
you can relay through. QT is setup to do that with no issues.
As for DNS I use http://xpertdns.com It is $6.95 a year for 1 to 5
domains. They have a web interface that is simple to use and I control
everything. Their nameservers are hosted in two different parts of the
country. Something I feel is important. They also support dynamic IP.
I personally feel that using static IPs is just bad policy. Sometime
soon I will share with this group a disaster recorvery plan I'm working
on for my clients. It outlines why hosting DNS yourself and static IPs
are bad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
