Do these permissions look correct for qmail-dk? I'm just trying to think of something...
-rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 49216 Mar 6 12:36 qmail-dk Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures Jason P wrote: > Randomly, incoming and outgoing mail will fail domainkey checks. I've > tested this with both yahoo and gmail, and get the same results. I > cannot understand what is happening or why. Might there be a package > domainkeys is depending on, that is not behaving correctly? I've > upgraded everything to the devel versions, double checked DNS records, > and sent out various tests. Sometimes it works, and other times it > doesn't. Does anyone have any clues? I'm running CentOS 4.3 x64. > > Thanks, > Jason qmail-dk is broken in some cases. That's why we don't use the BG settings in DKVERIFY. Some keys (gmail in particular) don't verify correctly. I'm not aware of a problem with outgoing signatures though. You might want to set "t=y" in your _domainkey DNS record until Alexey (or someone) gets a chance to fix up qmail-dk. FWIW, gmail (google, who's the force behind DK and DKIM) runs DK with t=y. DKIM will be relacing DomainKeys anyway some time in the future. DKIM was recently approved as a standard, but there's no toaster (or qmail TTBOMK) implementation of it yet. -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
