If I may jump in here with just a quick Q...
what is ment by "the stock blocklist"?
thnaks
Are you using something more than the stock blocklist? That can reduce
your
scanning load substantially.
Justice London wrote:
Yeah, but it's better than just getting the message rejected, which
seems to be happening right now if something happens to spamassassin.
This is bad since our clients then call and complain to no end.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 21:31 +0200, Janno Sannik wrote:
seems dangerous since this could be exploited by hitting mailserver with
lot's of spam and getting it to go through that way
Justice London wrote:
Is there a way to get simscan/spamassassin to do a soft reject of
messages, say under high load situations where spamassassin isn't
responding properly? I have found that when spamassassin either can't
accept a new connection, for whatever reason, that the client is passed
a 451 error right away. Is there a way to instead just have simscan
fail the spamassassin test and just pass the message un-checked?
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
