I've just used the QMT Recipe - and the good thing is the RPM based Install, quite modular etc ..
but the version of SpamAssassin winds up at 3.2.5, SpamAssassin at SpamAssassin is 3.3.1, Yum on Fedora 13 installs 3.3.2 I'm just trying to understand the reasoning behind sticking with a 3.2 based package There doesn't seem to be any issue running 3.3 with this recipe - and SpamA (and ClamAV) are packages that are always changing, the rest of QMT seems quite static. *David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 30/04/2011 11:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: > On 04/29/2011 03:47 PM, David Bray wrote: >> The SpamAssassin install installs version 3.2.5 >> >> These comments apply to Clam as well, Clam is more complex, but it makes >> the version updating a lot easier. >> >> If the Install was per Bill Schupp's notes: >> http://billslinuxqmail.sourceforge.net/toaster/ >> >> Then SpamAssassin version would be 3.3.2 >> >> I've just done an install on Fedora 13 and deviated from the recipe with >> SpamAssassin and Clam >> >> Just curious ... >> >> -- >> *David Bray* >> http://www.brayworth.com.au >> da...@brayworth.com.au > > I don't understand the point of this post. > > While Bill's Qmail Toaster is similar in many ways to QMT as they're > both based on Life With Qmail, there are substantial differences as > well. Sorry, but we do not support BQT here. See the corresponding > email list for that. >
