Hi , I have allowed 143,80,110,993,587,443,465,25 in iptables. Do I need to do any thing in iptables to rectify this issue.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:21 PM, cj yother <[email protected]> wrote: > Didn't the image you posted show port 587 being used? > > > On 09/15/2013 09:02 PM, ChandranManikandan wrote: > > Hi Dave, > I have run only clamav in our server as well iptables and i have allowed > 143 and 993 ports. > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, David Milholen <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Eric, >> Im just catching the end of this thread but I have seen some antivirus >> and firewall protection combos kill some >> mail authentication methods. >> Just for time being shutdown these apps to see if this is where the issue >> lies. >> It has all the symptoms! >> Thanks >> Dave >> >> >> On 9/15/2013 7:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: >> >> I'm not seeing any problem from the information you've given us. >> Can you show the warning message like you did in the first post of this >> thread? >> >> Is it possible that this client's name resolution is giving the IP >> address of a different host? >> # host mail.panasiagroup.net >> # host smtp.panasiagroup.net >> >> This host looks ok to me from what I can check. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Milholen >> Project Engineer >> P:501-318-1300 >> > > > > -- > *Thanks & Best Regards, > Manikandan.C > * > > > -- > -- *Thanks & Best Regards, Manikandan.C *
<<cj's_sig.png>>
