ok, i seem to have it working. installed ucspi-tcp6 as per instructions, edited the smtp & submission run scripts to use the new tcpserver and now they're on ipv4/6.
i also re-configured my dns recursor to listen on ipv4 & 6 (unsure if mandatory but makes sense in my mind). thanks. On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Eric Broch <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. It looked to be fairly straight forward, applying a patch and voila. > > Actually, looking on my backup server, I've already done this back in > January...don't remember all the details. > > I save all cli history, I'll see if I can dig it up for you. > > > > On 3/25/2017 3:10 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote: >> >> so you're saying i only need to worry about getting Uscpi-tcp6 up & >> running? >> >> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eric Broch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> 1) Yes >>> but >>> 2) QMT, after patching, has all the patches of netqmail-1.06. There are >>> some >>> documentation differences though. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. >>> >>> I was attempting this (what I think you're attempting) and was bogged >>> down >>> in the monolithic patch file qmailtoaster-1.2.3(?). I'm not sure I like >>> the >>> big patch files IMHO they're difficult to sort out. >>> Uscpi-tcp6 does (or should not) affect QMT. >>> >>> So, netqmail-1.05 is qmail-1.03 with a recommended patch bundle included >>> but >>> unapplied (applied at make, I think). Netqmail-1.06 has the recommended >>> patch bundle applied already and the documentation in the code indicating >>> as >>> much. Again, someone correct me if I'm wrong. >>> >>> >>> On 3/25/2017 1:59 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote: >>>> >>>> ohh, that's above my pay grade. unless (maybe) you can offer me some >>>> answers: >>>> >>>> 1.) current qmt is net-qmail v1.05 yes? >>>> 2.) if i attempt to get net-qmail 1.06 and patch it, what >>>> configuration selections are needed to match qmt's implementation / >>>> config files / etc? >>>> 3.) anything else i may need to know? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Eric Broch <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Fabian, >>>>> >>>>> Have a look here ucspi-tcp6 and here. >>>>> >>>>> If you get it tested and implemented can you let us know how? I've been >>>>> a >>>>> little busy lately. >>>>> >>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/23/2017 8:45 PM, Fabian A. Santiago wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Where is qmt lately with ipv6 support, specifically for the SMTP side? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> -- >>> Eric Broch, IMSO, DAM, NGOO, DITH, URTS >>> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > -- > Eric Broch, IMSO, DAM, NGOO, DITH, URTS > White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
