On March 26, 2017 4:06:32 PM EDT, Eric Broch <[email protected]> wrote:
>Have you tested it?
>
>
>On 3/25/2017 6:21 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
>> ok, i seem to have it working. installed ucspi-tcp6 as per
>> instructions, edited the smtp & submission run scripts to use the new
>> tcpserver and now they're on ipv4/6.
>>
>> i also re-configured my dns recursor to listen on ipv4 & 6 (unsure if
>> mandatory but makes sense in my mind).
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Eric Broch <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>> Yes. It looked to be fairly straight forward, applying a patch and
>voila.
>>>
>>> Actually, looking on my backup server, I've already done this back
>in
>>> January...don't remember all the details.
>>>
>>> I save all cli history, I'll see if I can dig it up for you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/25/2017 3:10 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
>>>> so you're saying i only need to worry about getting Uscpi-tcp6 up &
>>>> running?
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eric Broch
><[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 1) Yes
>>>>> but
>>>>> 2) QMT, after patching, has all the patches of netqmail-1.06.
>There are
>>>>> some
>>>>> documentation differences though. Someone can correct me if I'm
>wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was attempting this (what I think you're attempting) and was
>bogged
>>>>> down
>>>>> in the monolithic patch file qmailtoaster-1.2.3(?). I'm not sure I
>like
>>>>> the
>>>>> big patch files IMHO they're difficult to sort out.
>>>>> Uscpi-tcp6 does (or should not) affect QMT.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, netqmail-1.05 is qmail-1.03 with a recommended patch bundle
>included
>>>>> but
>>>>> unapplied (applied at make, I think). Netqmail-1.06 has the
>recommended
>>>>> patch bundle applied already and the documentation in the code
>indicating
>>>>> as
>>>>> much. Again, someone correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/25/2017 1:59 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
>>>>>> ohh, that's above my pay grade. unless (maybe) you can offer me
>some
>>>>>> answers:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.) current qmt is net-qmail v1.05 yes?
>>>>>> 2.) if i attempt to get net-qmail 1.06 and patch it, what
>>>>>> configuration selections are needed to match qmt's implementation
>/
>>>>>> config files / etc?
>>>>>> 3.) anything else i may need to know?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Eric Broch
><[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have a look here ucspi-tcp6 and here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you get it tested and implemented can you let us know how?
>I've been
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> little busy lately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/23/2017 8:45 PM, Fabian A. Santiago wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where is qmt lately with ipv6 support, specifically for the SMTP
>side?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Eric Broch, IMSO, DAM, NGOO, DITH, URTS
>>>>> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Eric Broch, IMSO, DAM, NGOO, DITH, URTS
>>> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>[email protected]
>>

So far I've only tested on the basic level of initiating SMTP connections from 
ipv4/6 and it does respond correctly. 

When I read about ucspi tcp6 tcpserver CLI options, I made the following change 
to SMTP / submission run files:

-l 0 -I eth0 (or whatever your interface name is)

Seems to be working on the surface but I wouldn't call it fully tested. 

-- 
Thanks.
Fabian S.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to