On 05/06/10 09:10, MartinWittemann wrote: > Sure I have the table in my mind. The current table is not my friend because > I fear that I have to fix upcoming critical bug since fabian is gone. I'm > the first to vote for a new table widget. ;) > But the reason we left it out of the roadmap was, that we can't promise that > we will finish or even start it this year. I currently have no idea how fast > we process building the list widget and all widgets following it. But the > plans are to start building a new table after finishing the new virtual > tree. >
hi martin, thanks for the clarification. would you mind also answering my other question regarding the state of caching inside the new data binding framework? here it is, for your convenience: """ my question was, does the model implementation in the new data binding framework support caching of objects on the client side? from what i see, things are too tied to json, thus not really usable for my purposes. i'm sorry if i'm missing someting obvious. """ thanks burak ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
