benco wrote: > > Thanks for the advice! > > Didn't know the smartTableModel included the concept of "views" - really > interesting ! > > However, my table contains 14 columns. So, 14*2 sorting states * 80000 = > 2.240.000 rows. > > Maybe I should give up and switch to the remoteModel all the same... >
As Derrell pointed out, you won't actually have 14 copies of the data around because rows are all shared by reference. Essentially, there is a "view zero" that includes all rows, and the other views just reference rows in view zero. My guess is that it would be problematic to keep 80,000 rows sorted via pure JavaScript. I've used the Smart model with numbers of rows in the low thousands, but beyond that you're going to get noticeable UI lag under IE. The very fastest browsers available would probably be OK with 80k rows, though, so it depends on what systems you're targeting. Dave -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Array-sort-vs-HTML5-Google-Gears-SQLite-orderby-benchmark-tp5487657p5488556.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
