On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 15:57, benco <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, I just noticed that IE can't even handle more than ~59600 rows (at
> least in my case).
>
If you drop IE support, maybe your customers will see the light and upgrade
to a decent browser. :-)
> So, switching to the remoteModel is not an eventuality anymore.
>
> What I think I'll do is to store the result in the HTML5 storage / Google
> Gears SQLite Databas when a remote request is done to reduce the number of
> request - but of course, there are those 5MB storage limit :(.
>
My understanding is that Google is dropping support for Gears. I don't know
if that's already happened, or is soon to happen, or if I'm hallucinating,
but you probably want to check into it before devoting too much effort to
that.
SQLite has no such storage limit. SQLite scales to huge databases really,
really well. Was that a limit imposed by Gears?
With the size of your data set, using a remote data model with server-side
sorting is likely the right way to do it anyway, and should be very
adequately fast if your server isn't overloaded and your Internet connection
doesn't have serious problems.
Derrell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
