On 30 sept. 2010, at 12:10, Stefan Andersson wrote:
> [CUT]
> If there is any interest to debate technology, we are very interested to lay
> out the words...As a matter of fact, too few of those discussions here today!
>
> Just to explain.
>
> Stefan
Hi Stefan,
I would be interested to know more about that "qooxdoo big project" I heard for
a while now.
Could you tell us more about the functional domain for example ?
Is it dedicated for a company internal use or is it intended to be public ?
Also, I would be interested in more general aspect than purely qooxdoo : the
software architecture you had choosen.
What is the backend ? What other framework are you using on the backend or
elsewhere ?
Are you using a relational database ? If yes, which one ?
How are you dealing with "fat client" pattern induced by qooxdoo ?
I think this is a very positive thing so the server can concentrate on server
things.
By the way, I find very useful to have the previous element of context in email
reply.
I'm not sure why all your emails had no previous context, so it is hard for me
to follow the thread in a classical email client as I have.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
