I wasn't advocating a move to Ant. I was just voicing my opinion that Robert should simply post his vote and let the chips fall where they may. Personally, I think going with Maven is the smart money. It seems like a majority of people think Maven will be the path forward at some point and it makes sense to bite the bullet earlier even if that means pushing the milestone out a day or two. Of course, my opinion is completely non-binding and lacks any technical expertise.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Maven build > > > I Agree with Eric - I think the simplest at this point is to > create a branch for M1, RC with ant and move on. I +1 for that. > > Then we re-open the java mainline for maven and everything > else for a M2. > > Carl. > > > Johnson, Eric wrote: > > Again with the continuing wasted e-mail bandwidth.... > > Is there a point to all this? You are clearly not in favor > of moving > > to Maven for M1 if ever. Please just vote -1 to doing so > and lets move > > on..... > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Greig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:06 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Maven build > >> > >> > >>> I worked on Sunday to get the initial mvn branch in. I > then worked > >>> again last night to do the distribution stuff, which was > a separate > >>> request. > >>> > >> Then there clearly has been another communication breakdown since > >> that was not my expectation or that of at least some others. > >> > >> RG > >> > >> > >
