Perhaps poorly phrased by Marnie. My view is that we're collectively committed to Maven.
Also, no matter how much experience some of us have on Maven, its always worthwhile getting a bit more :o) John On 21/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 6:03 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: > Hi All, > > FYI I've asked the Geronimo, MINA and Tapestry team to give us some > feedback > on their experiences with maven. Copied the text below. > > I'll post their responses (in summary) once they get back to me. > > Just want to do a quick (random) straw poll before we get too much > further. Sorry, but this is really annoying. So I guess the experiences of those of us already working on Qpid who have successfully used maven before don't count for anything? I guess all the explanations for why moving to maven is A Good Thing™ that Dan Kulp and I have provided over the past few weeks don't count for anything? Sheesh. Why the second guessing? I really don't get it. --steve > > Marnie > > Hi All, > > I work on the Apache Incubator project Qpid. We are currently mid > transition > to maven for build/release. > > We've encountered a few issues along the way (snapshots, directory > structures etc). I wondered if you could give me some feedback on your > project's experiences with maven please ? Would you recommend it > for use ? > > Thanks in advance, > Marnie
