I'm quite happy with the phrasing thanks :-) I'm simply trying to get some independent feedback.
Not posting any further on this thread until I have some feedback to share, hopefully positive. Marnie On 11/22/06, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps poorly phrased by Marnie. My view is that we're collectively committed to Maven. Also, no matter how much experience some of us have on Maven, its always worthwhile getting a bit more :o) John On 21/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 21, 2006, at 6:03 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > FYI I've asked the Geronimo, MINA and Tapestry team to give us some > > feedback > > on their experiences with maven. Copied the text below. > > > > I'll post their responses (in summary) once they get back to me. > > > > Just want to do a quick (random) straw poll before we get too much > > further. > > Sorry, but this is really annoying. So I guess the experiences of > those of us already working on Qpid who have successfully used maven > before don't count for anything? I guess all the explanations for why > moving to maven is A Good Thing™ that Dan Kulp and I have provided > over the past few weeks don't count for anything? > > Sheesh. > > Why the second guessing? I really don't get it. > > --steve > > > > > Marnie > > > > Hi All, > > > > I work on the Apache Incubator project Qpid. We are currently mid > > transition > > to maven for build/release. > > > > We've encountered a few issues along the way (snapshots, directory > > structures etc). I wondered if you could give me some feedback on your > > project's experiences with maven please ? Would you recommend it > > for use ? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Marnie > >
