Hi All, I also submitted an NDA at the same time as Martin, and have just been reading the links Rajith provided.
It'd be good to get Cliff's view on this since we both submitted them to Geir long before this development - so it might (we can only hope) be that we are already legit but just haven't received confirmation. I'll be back in full effect in the not too distant future and can them help with TCK runs. Bfn, Marnie On 7/6/07, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 5, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > Brian McCallister wrote: >> >> On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: >> >>> >>> Do I understand correctly that we can continue to test against >>> the TCK. It also does not look like we will get the cert, but >>> assume we can say on the wiki that we have run and pass all the >>> TCK tests. >>> >> >> The ASF already has the JMS 1.1 TCK. The key would be not signing >> additional people onto the NDA. I strongly suggest joining the jcp- >> open mailing list if ya'll want to implement JMS, though :-) >> >> -Brian > > Brain, > > We have a client that Implements and passes 100% of the TCK. The > question is if we can say we are compliant given the current issues > with JCP, or if we need to just say we pass 100% of the TCK. > I am not sure the answer to this question -- I swore off the JCP a couple years ago after seeing how much JCP stuff was driven by Sun internal politics rather than the actual JCP members, much less any of the technologies involved. Just wanted to point this out to ya'll, and strongly suggest that if you do care, join the mailing list and speak up. -Brian
