Hello, Regarding the 0.10 URL scheme I think that we have decided to base it on: https://wiki.108.redhat.com/wiki/index.php/AMQP:95:Proposal
So, the URL grammar is (if we replace amqp by qpid): qpid_url = "qpid:" prot_addr_list ["/" future-parameters] prot_addr_list = [prot_addr ","]* prot_addr prot_addr = tcp_prot_addr | tls_prot_addr | future_prot_addr tcp_prot_addr = tcp_id tcp_addr tcp_id = "tcp:" | "" tcp_addr = [host [":" port] ] host = <as per http://www.apps.ietf.org/> port = number tls_prot_addr = tls_id tls_addr tcp_id = "tls:" | "" tls_addr = [host [":" port] ] future_prot_addr = future_prot_id future_prot_addr future_prot_id = <placeholder, must end in ":". Example "sctp:"> future_prot_addr = <placeholder, protocl-specific address> future_parameters = <placeholder, not used in failover addresses> I think that we need to add some user options for specifying the key store location, the virtual host etc.. So following http://www.apps.ietf.org/ I would extend the grammar with some user options like this: qpid_url = "qpid:" [client_opts]* prot_addr_list ["/" future-parameters] client_opts = [client_opt ";"] client_opt "@" client_opt = prop "=" val prop = <as per http://www.apps.ietf.org/> i.e. string without reserved characters val = <as per http://www.apps.ietf.org/> i.e. string without reserved characters prot_addr_list = [prot_addr ","]* prot_addr prot_addr = tcp_prot_addr | tls_prot_addr | future_prot_addr tcp_prot_addr = tcp_id tcp_addr tcp_id = "tcp:" | "" tcp_addr = [host [":" port] ] host = <as per http://www.apps.ietf.org/> port = number tls_prot_addr = tls_id tls_addr tcp_id = "tls:" | "" tls_addr = [host [":" port] ] future_prot_addr = future_prot_id future_prot_addr future_prot_id = <placeholder, must end in ":". Example "sctp:"> future_prot_addr = <placeholder, protocl-specific address> future_parameters = <placeholder, not used in failover addresses> For example we could use a very simple URL like: qpid:tcp:host1,tcp:host2 or a more complicated one like: qpid:clientID=foo;username=bar;password=pass;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:host1:2345,keystorloc=/usr/local;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:host2:5555 What do you think about this scheme? Arnaud
