Agreed... sticking to the amqp format would be great that would give us something that looked like:
amqp:tcp:host.domain.com:5672/virtualhost=test;username=guest;password=guest which does look tidier to me, Thoughts from others? -- Rob On 21/08/07, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/08/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What do you think about this scheme? > > Looks fine but I have one question: why have client_opts at the start? > Why not include them at the end as part of future_parameters? Putting > them at the start would only be necessary if we had a hierarchical > URL. > > If we did that would we need to deviate from the amqp:// format? > > RG >
