On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 09:13 -0400, Alan Conway wrote: > The combination sounds like a good choice. The "after" option complies > with 0-10 and is convenient for clusters where user ids etc. are > consistent across the cluster which is likely to be a common case. > However I think we may well find situations where you want to specify > some different connection properties per broker, so it seems like a > healthy extension to the 0-10 format that we can push into 0-11. > I'd also be inclined to accept either amqp: or qpid: in parsing. > amqp: because we can parse standard 0-10 URLs, so we shouldn't refuse to > do so. qpid: for those who wish to highlight that they are using a > qpid-specific feature, e.g. because they use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] format. > > We could have 2 parsers and not allow qpid extensions in an amqp: URL > but I don't think that is a pressing feature, we can add it if/when > there's a need.
That sounds good to me, we already have a qpid parser so it will be easy to provide an additional amqp one. Arnaud
