I have updated the JIRAs to reflect the listed IDs. On 10/01/2008, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aidan, > > Should we schedule a call for sharing the workload? > Cheers > > Arnaud > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 23:29 +0000, Aidan Skinner wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2008 10:47 PM, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Is it accurate to say that all issues with the "fix for" field set to > > > M2.1 must be done for this release or is the plan just to see what is > > > done on 22 Feb? I see from Jira that there are 65 issues, a good > > > number of which have not yet been marked as "resolved". > > > > It *will* be accurate to say this, once we've fixed up the bugs a > > little. The list we agreed previously was: > > > > QPID-9, QPID-43, QPID-107, QPID-251, QPID-261, QPID-413, QPID-531, > > QPID-543, QPID-551, QPID-553, QPID-558, QPID-560, QPID-564, QPID-567, > > QPID-574, QPID-576, QPID-588, QPID-592, QPID-594, QPID-42 > > > > > A while back one of the "themes" for the M2.1 release was going to be > > > interop. How are we doing on that? Do we have out of the box interop > > > with Rabbit or OpenAMQ (subject to its limited feature set)? Do our > > > performance tests run unmodified against those brokers? > > > > I think the interop stuff is better in M2.1, partly because of the > > multi-version support. I don't have anything solid to back that up > > though. > > > > - Aidan > >
-- Martin Ritchie
