On Jan 11, 2008 3:40 PM, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Might it make more sense to put M2.1 and M3 out at the same time? That > > way we can provide > > best interop between then. > > It seems to me - and correct me if I am wrong - that M2.1 is much more > of a "known quantity" than M3 which implements the 0-10 protocol. > > I think it is important to get this "interop release" out as quickly > as possible so from that perspective it would make sense not to tie it > to another release.
I don't see much reason to tie the two together, 0-8 and 0-9 are fixed targets which M3 needs to support as well and it will need to support them in the form of existing M2 (ie. 0-8) deployments so any fixes need to be done there. - Aidan -- aim/y!:aidans42 g:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/ "It is no weakness for the wisest man to learn when he is wrong." - Sophocles
