On 11/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Might it make more sense to put M2.1 and M3 out at the same time? That > way we can provide > best interop between then.
It seems to me - and correct me if I am wrong - that M2.1 is much more of a "known quantity" than M3 which implements the 0-10 protocol. I think it is important to get this "interop release" out as quickly as possible so from that perspective it would make sense not to tie it to another release. If M3 is all done and dusted at the point of the proposed M2.1 code freeze then fine, but otherwise I would suggest we keep the releases separate. RG
