On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Peter Evans wrote: > SkyDeep ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Does anybody have an open-source alternative? I hate to say this on the > > qpopper list, but I'm not terribly impressed with the software. I know
like the one guy said, you have the source, if you're not impressed, fix it. If not, ya know, you catch more flies with honey.... > > Is there another POP3 server that may be more reliable and secure? And > > doesn't have 1+MB footprint ta boot? Are there alternative encryption > > configurations I can run with qpopper that will give my clients secure > > e-mail? > https/SSL web frontend to it? > > I am appalled that I might have to bust out some low-level trace debugger > > to find out if I can run freakin secure POP3 connections! > other people have reported it working for them have you tried 4.0.4? its bad enough to complain about free software, but then to take it furthur and complain about a "beta"... --Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asteroid-b612.org "Strange, but it seems, there's a mutiny brewing inside of me" .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
