Folks, I'm arriving fashionably late somewhere in the middle of this discussion. I have some information that I'd like to share. Since I could not locate an archive of the list anywhere online, please forgive me if this info has already been posted.
Anyway, here's my scenario. I have a FreeBSD 4.5 machine on which I recently upgraded OpenSSL. I went from version 0.9.6d to 0.9.6g. Initially, I left the old 0.9.6d libraries in place. I pointed qpopper's configure script to the 0.9.6g includes, though. qpopper build properly but I experienced the aforementioned errors: "Possible probe of account ..." Next, I manually removed all traces OpenSSL and installed 0.9.6g again. qpopper would not build. The following is what I see when the build fails: /usr/lib/libssl.a(ssl_algs.o): In function `SSL_library_init': ssl_algs.o(.text+0x34): undefined reference to `EVP_idea_cbc' So, does anyone have any ideas here? Thanks, Scott Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 10:17 PM 9/9/2002, you wrote: >At 07:39 PM 9/9/02 -0700, The Little Prince wrote: >>On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Peter Evans wrote: >> >>> SkyDeep ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> > Does anybody have an open-source alternative? I hate to say this on the >>> > qpopper list, but I'm not terribly impressed with the software. I know >> >>like the one guy said, you have the source, if you're not impressed, fix >>it. If not, ya know, you catch more flies with honey.... > >Being nice got me ignored. > >I was under the impression there were people here who had this setup working, who had >some insight to lend. I was hoping someone could offer more direction than "check >out the libraries and re-compile them in every permutation known to man". The whole idea of these lists is to see if anyone else may have an idea what the problem is so I can save time. Not so some windbag can tell me to go to Google or lecture me on the philosophical value of encryption of smtp/pop3 traffic. > >Sorry if I'm ticked off but I expected a little more support from a support list. >It's disappointing. I'm aware that I can re-invent the damn wheel as an option, the >whole point is to avoid that by asking questions here. > >Forget it. I won't bother anyone else. I am sorry I asked any questions.
