At 07:39 PM 9/9/02 -0700, The Little Prince wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Peter Evans wrote:
>
> > SkyDeep ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Does anybody have an open-source alternative?  I hate to say this on the
> > > qpopper list, but I'm not terribly impressed with the software.  I know
>
>like the one guy said, you have the source, if you're not impressed, fix
>it. If not, ya know, you catch more flies with honey....

Being nice got me ignored.

I was under the impression there were people here who had this setup 
working, who had some insight to lend.  I was hoping someone could offer 
more direction than "check out the libraries and re-compile them in every 
permutation known to man".  The whole idea of these lists is to see if 
anyone else may have an idea what the problem is so I can save time.  Not 
so some windbag can tell me to go to Google or lecture me on the 
philosophical value of encryption of smtp/pop3 traffic.

Sorry if I'm ticked off but I expected a little more support from a support 
list.  It's disappointing.  I'm aware that I can re-invent the damn wheel 
as an option, the whole point is to avoid that by asking questions here.

Forget it.  I won't bother anyone else.  I am sorry I asked any questions.

Reply via email to