-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 11 September 2002 14:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Carles Xavier Munyoz Bald� wrote: > > Using TSL in the pop3 communication for read the messages > > from your mailbox has no sense because the messages have > > traversed the internet until reach your mailbox in clear > > text. > > Not all email traverses the Internet. > To believe otherwise is naive.
Ok, but the messages are send out of your computer to the wire in clear text, and in the same wire may be people of your company sniffing network traffic and looking at all your private email :-) What I'm trying to say since my first email is that for a totally secure email communication, the only solution is peer to peer encryption based on public key cryptograpy. Until the moment I have not seen any valid argument against my words. The TSL in the POP3 server and in the MTA only gives security in parts of the way followed by the message, but not in all the way. For this reason (I repeat it again) for a totally secure email communication, the only solution is peer to peer encryption based on public key cryptograpy. Greetings. - --- Carles Xavier Munyoz Bald� [EMAIL PROTECTED] Descom Consulting Telf: +34 965861024 Fax: +34 965861024 http://www.descom.es/ - --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBPX9BaDvYAf7VZNaaEQJo2wCfUNyg0Jvdoqfzv135d/CX4QQYvgIAn2Qs +d7kLjJ7OBEFgzrfMW7AfgAq =XKaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
