> I don't think anyone was suggesting that Mail::SpamAssassin is > lighter. The idea is to have spamd running and have the plugin > communicate with it, as in the spamassassin plugin that's in > cvs (and the various patches that have been posted to this > list). The plugin acts as a client to spamd, without involving > spamc.
In a perfect world, there would be a Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamC, or something.. a lightweight perl equivalent of spamc, so we wouldn't have to re-implement it. -R
