Robert Spier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a perfect world, there would be a Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamC, > or something.. a lightweight perl equivalent of spamc, so we > wouldn't have to re-implement it.
True. It would also be nice if it were possible to get more information from spamd, like the SA version and the autolearn status, without having to get the whole rewritten message. Perhaps a HEADERS command. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
