On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, John Peacock wrote:
Devin Carraway wrote:It's a pretty short adjustment to forkserver; we already can listen on multiple addresses, allowing a port number to be included is easy enough.Hmmm, I never looked at the forkserver code. I'll take a look at implementing this, because I would very much like to eliminate the extra stunnel setup...
stunnel is doing a different job. You can't accept connections on port 465 and port 25 and treat them equally and expect things to work.
