On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, John Peacock wrote:
Devin Carraway wrote:
It's a pretty short adjustment to forkserver; we already can listen on
multiple addresses, allowing a port number to be included is easy
enough.
Hmmm, I never looked at the forkserver code. I'll take a look at
implementing this, because I would very much like to eliminate the extra
stunnel setup...
stunnel is doing a different job. You can't accept connections on port 465
and port 25 and treat them equally and expect things to work.
Ah, but I see in a later message that that is not what you are
suggesting... Looks interesting.
