Robin Bowes wrote:
[...]
Sounds like this should be a configurable option, with default behaviour
to accept addresses without <>.

I don't object to it being configurable (other than the code involved), but I think we should opt for RFC compliance as the default when the RFC is unambiguous.

Thanks,

Gordon

--
Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.gormand.com.au
Gormand Pty Ltd  PO Box 239 St Pauls NSW 2031 Australia
 "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance
 of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who
 have too little." Franklin D Roosevelt, Second Inaugural Address, 1937

Reply via email to