Johan Almqvist wrote: >> 1) a vBulleting-webboard, and >> 2) rsync so that all those that want to can have their set of plugins >> in use (check with the configfile, and only rsync the active ones) >> shared with the world. > > I don't feel either of these will be a good replacement for the current > wiki. I agree that placing the plugin repository in the wiki wasn't the > best idea (I just couldn't think of a better way of doing it at the time).
Yes - the plug-ins in the wiki model is a little cumbersome - though sometimes useful if I want to peek at some code. Perhaps a SVN repo and have people submit a simple application to get check-in rights (much like Twiki do with their plug-ins) is an idea? You can link each plug-in in the Wiki to an SVN browser. > However even if there was a separate plugin repository and a vBulletin, > I'd still want the wiki to direct all the forum (and list) RTFM's to... Agreed. Regards James Turnbull -- James Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Author of Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) --- PGP Key (http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0C42DF40)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
