On Thu, 2007-04-01 at 23:58 +1100, James Turnbull wrote: > > I don't feel either of these will be a good replacement for the > current > > wiki. I agree that placing the plugin repository in the wiki wasn't > the > > best idea (I just couldn't think of a better way of doing it at the > time). > > Yes - the plug-ins in the wiki model is a little cumbersome - though > sometimes useful if I want to peek at some code. Perhaps a SVN repo
I was wondering about linking Twiki and Trac. > and have people submit a simple application to get check-in rights > (much > like Twiki do with their plug-ins) is an idea? You can link each > plug-in in the Wiki to an SVN browser. Could we do this with a Twkik plug-in ? Trac would provide subversion integration, iirc. I'd much prefer twiki (or anything close to docuwiki) for the documentation. I discovered that Twiki has an awful lot of features (latex, xsl) that I would use (or at least play with :-) http://www.wikimatrix.org/show/TWiki [ I'm going to do this for personal use anyway but I'll contribute anything to qpsmtpd that anyone thinks would be useful. ] -- --gh
