On 1/8/19 8:24 AM, Eike Ziller wrote: > Two prominent server implementations for C++, Clangd and cquery are based on > libclang, so I’d expect some of the issues that we have (like with parsing > some Windows headers, file locking, getting it to use the right compiler > options, parsing speed) will simply be the same.
clangd does not use libclang. Anyway, this does not invalidate the above statement completely as there is some shared code. >> I too have noticed QtC's recent versions slowing down. I used to think it >> was a cool add, but it's starting to get in the way. OR it could be that my >> expectations have increased and I rely on it more whereas it as a >> nice-to-have. But the slowdowns remove the value added. > > Please definitely make sure that you use a configuration that does not > include any clang-tidy checks (Options > C++ > Code Model). Any of these > check should be considered “optional, only enable if they do not degrade > performance for you”. > > I fell into the same trap recently, so I wonder what we could do to provide > users with better hints when this happens? In Options > C++ > Code Model, where the diagnostic configuration for the code model is selected, we could display a warning if the configuration contains any checks for tidy/clazy. Nikolai _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qt-creator
