Just found this: http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2011/02/12/nokia-new-strategic-direction-what-is-the-future-for-qt/
Which makes me feel better. On 13 February 2011 09:03, Sarkawt Amedi <[email protected]> wrote: > There is another reason make me disappointed and afraid that is the new > version of Qt creator 2.1 didn't come till now while it was supposed to be > here at December 2010. > Any one can tell us why ??? > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Alejandro Exojo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> El Sábado, 12 de Febrero de 2011, Coda Highland escribió: >> > Qt for general embedded use is still healthy and a good idea to use. >> > It's only Qt's position on mobile phones in specific that's in >> > trouble, and with android-lighthouse and the third-party Qt for iPhone >> > port the irony is that Qt will run on all major platforms EXCEPT >> > Nokia's. >> >> Even more ironic is the fact that Palm uses Qt on webOS: >> >> http://opensource.palm.com/2.0.0/index.html >> >> Javispedro on the #meego IRC channel told that is used for the primary UI >> quite heavily. It would even make sense if Nokia sold Qt to HP, but I >> doubt >> any company is interested in making deals with a rival. If only a former >> HP >> manager were Nokia's CEO... :-P >> >> -- >> Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 >> http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net >> _______________________________________________ >> Qt-creator mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
