Hi. > So, I just had luck that my system libraries are working with the > pre-compiled Qt Jambi?
Seems to be ... > I don't know, but normally the required libraries are installed as a deb or > rpm package and the application can use them (of course on Windows you just > give the user all necessary libraries to install under C:/Programs/Your > App/). But I think there are none Qt Jambi packages right now. At least > there are none for Debian. AFAIK ubuntu has some qt-jambi packages, I have used jambi-designer from there, but some of them are buggy ( and as I know ubuntu, they will stay buggy forever :-] ). But when I tried to backport that packages to etch, I wasn't successfull. I thing that ubuntu has different configure parameters of qt4 for qtjambi compatibility. I understand your fight, native qt-jambi binary distribution is little unfriendly for linux ( I mean shell scripts wrapping designer etc..., they are looking for some stuff in 'pwd' and so they are absolutely unusable as system libraries). But - original binary qtjambi distribution has a big benefit - you should run your application on any computer if you bundle qt jars together with your app, because that jars contains native c++ qt libs too. I know that it is 'breaking' the package managment idea on most linux distros and using much more disk/ram space, but sometimes it should be very useful ( mostly when you want to run your apps on mixed environment [windows/linux] ). > If I ask the user to compile Qt Jambi against his Qt4 system libraries, > then the user need first to install all necessary -dev packages? Yes. But it was a hard job on debian, I wasn't successful some time ago ( I spent about 1 day with it, configure, make, wait_long_time, not works, delete, reconfigure, rebuild ... ) -- Dusan _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
