On Friday 07 August 2009 19:42:15 Tom Schindl wrote: > Dusan Zatkovsky schrieb: > >> Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > >>> Helge Fredriksen wrote: > >>>> Really, such strange deployment issues really makes it tough to > >>>> tease open source developers into using Jambi. Having to compile and > >>>> distribute the whole Qt system each time you want do develop something > >>>> in Jambi makes it look really obscure to most developers. > > > > This is true, I absolutely agree with you. But when you want to use your > > jambi application on different operating systems, some of them has > > primitive package and dependency management ( for example windows with no > > application dependency tracking at all ), you've a trouble. How you > > should guarantee, that your .jar will work on debian, fedora, winxp? > > > > This is a big failure of Java world, I think, because I can't find > > satisfactory solution how to track jar dependencies. > > Maven? > OSGi? > > Tom
Maven is only for build. But at least on Linux you can just create deb/rpm packages containing the jar files and use the normal package managment to resolve the dependencies. Erwin. _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
