José Arcángel Salazar Delgado wrote: > For Eskil and Gunnar: > > > is possible to use the name qt jambi in unofficial website?
The project is released under the LGPL license, so I don't see why using the name in a webpage should be problematic. To my knowledge this would be ok. > is possible to create qt jambi poms, and upload to a public maven repos? If you upload the lgpl packages to a maven repo, then I don't see any problems with that. The packages would be usable in both opensource and commercial projects. > what will be the destiny of the qt jambi eclipse integration after the > year of maintenance? There are quite a few issues that would have to be worked out for the eclipse integration to be opened up and released under LGPL and we don't have the resources to do that, unfortunately. best regards, Gunnar _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
