> José Arcángel Salazar Delgado wrote: > > For Eskil and Gunnar: > > > > > > is possible to use the name qt jambi in unofficial website? > > The project is released under the LGPL license, so I don't see why using > the name in a webpage should be problematic. To my knowledge this would > be ok. > > > is possible to create qt jambi poms, and upload to a public maven repos? > > If you upload the lgpl packages to a maven repo, then I don't see any > problems with that. The packages would be usable in both opensource and > commercial projects. > > > what will be the destiny of the qt jambi eclipse integration after the > > year of maintenance? > > There are quite a few issues that would have to be worked out for the > eclipse integration to be opened up and released under LGPL and we don't > have the resources to do that, unfortunately. > it is possible that you comment how do you create the qt jambi integration? At least a few tips to start a new project to create another integration > best regards, > Gunnar
_______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
