On 6/7/2011 9:16 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> CMake is full of obscure stuff that has been tested and well researched. > > > it's undeniable that cmake has a "slight" headstart over anything we or > anybody else might come up with. > but this advantage is also your handicap. you look at everything from > the "how can we fit that into cmake?" perspective. we don't. we want > more, much more.
I am just trying to figure out what that "much more" is. I think it would be ideal if C++ had less build options, not another one. I of course would like to see CMake as that build system. I am offering to work with you to create something that will leverage what we have and what you want. At the end of the day, qt would be able to "out source" the build system to the CMake community. It would save developer time at Nokia and strengthen the entire C++ community. But, back to the practical. Is there a design document, or set of use cases that we can look it to see if CMake does fit what you are looking for? -Bill _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
