On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On 06/07/11 14:16, ext Bill Hoffman wrote: > > On 6/7/2011 6:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >> but there is certainly room for borrowing some code or at least > >> algorithms - cmComputeLinkInformation.cxx for example is a bonanza of > >> well-researched obscure stuff. > > > > CMake might still be CMake, but with a dual "UI". I think what we are > > talking about is providing a new input specification to CMake. > > no.
So what do you actually want from the buildsystem what cmake does not provide right now ? Alex _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
