I think maybe it's better to continue the discussion on a separate thread? Apparently everyone agrees that QRegExp needs improvements and fixups, but what exactly are the expectations for the default regexp engine for Qt5? Since (apparently) the discussion is still going on, it seems to me that no consensus has been reached yet.
So, please, discuss: what are the features people want to be supported in 5.0? What to do with the current engine (keep it as the default in order not to break anything, or change it to the RegExp2 implementation, or overhaul it, etc.)? Did anyone do some research with an alternative engine implementation (PCRE, ICU, V8, etc.) and can provide some results? Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
