On Sunday 04 September 2011 21:31:50 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > I think maybe it's better to continue the discussion on a separate thread? > > Apparently everyone agrees that QRegExp needs improvements and fixups, > but what exactly are the expectations for the default regexp engine > for Qt5? Since (apparently) the discussion is still going on, it seems > to me that no consensus has been reached yet. > > So, please, discuss: what are the features people want to be supported > in 5.0? What to do with the current engine (keep it as the default in > order not to break anything, or change it to the RegExp2 > implementation, or overhaul it, etc.)? Did anyone do some research > with an alternative engine implementation (PCRE, ICU, V8, etc.) and > can provide some results? > > Cheers,
There is also the std::regex in C++11, which should work with QString and QByteArray. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C++11#Regular_expressions _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
