Den 04. sep. 2011 21:31, skrev ext Giuseppe D'Angelo: > I think maybe it's better to continue the discussion on a separate thread? > > Apparently everyone agrees that QRegExp needs improvements and fixups, > but what exactly are the expectations for the default regexp engine > for Qt5? Since (apparently) the discussion is still going on, it seems > to me that no consensus has been reached yet.
Agreed. There's also https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-20888 -- that's a good place to add concerns and alternatives discussed here, so they don't get "lost". Kent _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
