----- Original Message ----- > From: Bjørn Erik Nilsen <[email protected]> >> While this may be completely true for GUI applications, it's not true >> for applications that doesn't have a GUI at all. The vision is great >> when we talk about technologies of the same "level" (QWidgets vs > QML) >> and if this discussion was about QWidgets I would understand your >> point. >> >> But QtCore goes way far QML can go and IMHO we should support these use > cases... >> > > Yes, we will continue to support these use cases (if possible), it's > just that our main focus is shifted towards QtQuick-based applications > which means that is the use case we are going to optimize for.
Out of curiosity, how much of the user-base of Qt would that be for? 40%? 60%? It's certainly not 100%, and as otherwise noted in one of the threads over the last few days, Qt Commercial users would have a problem using QtQuick given licensing issues. (Not unsolvable for them; but still an issue.) I do realize that Qt Commercial users are probably <10% of Qt users right now, the biggest being KDE users. I'm just curious how this all falls out. Personally I haven't gotten into using QML yet - namely b/c it would be too big an overhaul of my one GUI application to do so; and most of my applications are closer to QtCore - being daemons via the QtService Component. $0.02 Ben _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
