On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:25 +0200, Bjørn Erik Nilsen wrote: > On 9/8/11 12:59 PM, ext Peter Kuemmel wrote: > > JS in QtCore is not needed in headless embedded software. > > But it would be a reason to not use Qt in such a project if JS couldn't be > > disabled. > > > > Exactly. It would be a good reason to not use *Qt5* in such a project. > Qt4 is more suitable for that use case.
Huh? You want them to stick with Qt4? For how long? One year? Three? Five? Putting entirely needless extra obstacles in the Qt5 migration path is not very promising. Qt5 was also about better modularization so that different modules can move at different speeds. Binding QML/JS to the core means you can only move with the development speed of core, whereas I would assume QML/JS development currently progresses a bit faster than that. regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
