On 9/8/11 12:59 PM, ext Peter Kuemmel wrote: > JS in QtCore is not needed in headless embedded software. > But it would be a reason to not use Qt in such a project if JS couldn't be > disabled. >
Exactly. It would be a good reason to not use *Qt5* in such a project. Qt4 is more suitable for that use case. > I think "Core" is a the wrong name for a library with a complete JS > interpreter/jit compiler. > Maybe it is possible to introduce an additional library (QtMicroCore?) > a level below QtCore which really has only core functionality: signal slot, > reflection, QString, ... but absolutely nothing gui related (QSize, QPoint, > QState*, QAnimationGroup, QTranslation, ...) > With the vision of Qt5 fresh in mind, it makes perfectly sense to move JS into QtCore. It *is* the core of all Qt5 applications. -- Bjørn Erik Nilsen Software Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
