----- Original Message -----

> From: Bjørn Erik Nilsen <[email protected]>
> On 9/8/11 3:33 PM, ext Jason H wrote:
>>  I wholly disagree. It is the core of *your* Qt5 apps, but probably 
> won't
>>  be mine.
>>  It is also a poor decision to say "let them eat cake" and by cake 
> I mean
>>  Qt4.
> 
> The root of the problem is that we are not aligned on the vision for Qt5.
> 
> If the vision for Qt5 is to create a paradigm shift and move QtQuick to 
> the core of all future Qt applications, then the only sane option is to 
> move JS into QtCore.
> 
> If we disagree on the vision, we better start figuring out what our 
> vision should be so that we can all work towards the same goal.

I would say that in general the community disagrees with you, especially the 
embedded community, and most likely the commercial Qt community too.

I think the general consensus is that there is no problem with your stated 
"vision" supposing that applies to GUI applications only.
However, the Qt community is a lot larger than GUI applications.

Even in the GUI community, I would be quite surprised if the majority where 
even close to using QML/JS right now; something that with Qt4 is problematic 
per licensing for commercial users (LGPL only code for the JS - yeah, that's 
been quoted as being fixed for Qt5).

And yes, there are still a lot of applications that require integrating the 
standard QWidget model. For example, I have an application that draws points to 
a QWidget-derived object. I have a very hard time seeing how I would be able to 
do the same thing under QML, especially at the performance levels I need. Yes, 
I'm planning on eventually drawing to a QPixMap (I have a lot of work and 
research to do before I can do that), which may make it easier but still 
requires the QPainter methodology. I'm sure I'm not alone in that requirement.

Ben

_______________________________________________
Qt5-feedback mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback

Reply via email to