In data giovedì 8 settembre 2011 13:25:10, Bjørn Erik Nilsen ha scritto: > On 9/8/11 12:59 PM, ext Peter Kuemmel wrote: > > JS in QtCore is not needed in headless embedded software. > > But it would be a reason to not use Qt in such a project if JS couldn't > > be disabled. > > Exactly. It would be a good reason to not use *Qt5* in such a project. > Qt4 is more suitable for that use case.
Who's going to take care of an old version of Qt forever? who wants to keep 2 different versions of the same library on the same system? and who wants to continue to ship an old version? No one. You are telling people "you have few years to move away from Qt" while you should tell people "next version will be the best version ever with more features". I think that beeing able to write lightweight system components with QtCore is a great feature and that isn't happening thanks to a widespread bad perception about Qt modularity that can get worse. I would love to see the next generation init system or the next device management daemon using QtCore and QtDBus instead of g* libraries. If you will move all the V8 stuff inside QtCore no one will write a system component with QtCore 5. Please keep making a good framework that works nicely also on systems without a screen. Bye, Davide Bettio. _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
